2023年英语六级阅读理解参考练习题,菁选2篇（范例推荐）

时间：2023-02-01 13:45:06 来源：网友投稿

英语六级阅读理解的参考练习题1　　TheHomosexualFamily　　Althoughmanypeopledonotthinkofhomosexualrelationshipsasresult下面是小编为大家整理的2023年英语六级阅读理解参考练习题,菁选2篇（范例推荐）,供大家参考。

英语六级阅读理解的参考练习题1

　　The Homosexual Family

　　Although many people do not think of homosexual relationships as resulting in a family, it has been estimated that about one of five gays and one of three lesbians enter a homosexual marriage. The marriage may or may not be established by a formal ceremony. One male couple , for example , after four months of cohabitation3, went to Mass4 and let the service be their private ceremony of commitment. They used the term marriage to describe their relationship. They bought matching rings and verbally agreed to be sexually faithful, to emotionally support each other, and to have equal say in such * as finances.

　　Moreover, millions of gays and lesbians have had children. In many cases, the children were born when the individual was part of a heterosexual marriage . Subsequently, the individual openly acknowledged his or her homosexual preference. Some of these children are being raised in a homosexual family — two men, two women, or some other arrangement. For example, Nancy is a lesbian who is raising a daughter with two gay males, one of whom is the child’s father.

　　Homosexual couples have to work through the same problems as heterosexual couples. They face issues of household division of labor, power, sexual relationships, and money. In addition, like the interracial couple , they face problems arising from being in a socially stigmatized relationship. Gallup polls5 that asked the American public whether homosexual relations between consenting adults should be legal have found an increasing proportion from the mid-1970s to the late 1990s who said that they should not be legal. Homosexual families, then, must not only deal with the same issues as other families but also with a hostile environment and with some problems that are unique to6 the homosexual relationship .

　　阅读自测

　　Ⅰ. Are these statements True or False according to the article ?

　　1. Like heterosexual marriage, homosexual marriage must go through a formal ceremony.

　　2. Most of the children of homosexuals are adopted from other places.

　　3. Homosexual couples just have to confront the same problems as heterosexual couples.

　　4. Homosexual couples have to overcome various problems and still have a long way to go .

　　5. From the mid-1970s, homosexual marriages are gradually accepted by our society.

　　Ⅱ. Choose the best answer to fill in the blanks :

　　1. The tax increases in ______to the amount you earn.

　　A. accordance B. proportion C. ratio D. scale

　　2. There are some * ______ from the recent changes in the law.

　　A. raising B. happening C. arising D. rising

　　3. The father is not willing to consent ______ the marriage.

　　A. to B. from C. with D. in

　　参考答案

　　Ⅰ. 1. F 2. F 3 . F 4. T 5. F

　　Ⅱ. 1. B 2. C 3 . A

　　参考译文

　　同性恋家庭

　　尽管许多人认为同性恋关系不能使两个同性恋者组成一个家庭, 但据估计大约每五个男同性恋者中就有一个会与同性结婚, 而每三个女同性恋者中则会有一个与同性结婚。同性恋者的婚姻关系也许会通过正式的仪式得以确认, 也许根本就不通过正式仪式。比如说, 一对男同性恋者同居四个月以后, 会去教堂望弥撒, 他们将这种宗教活动作为互相托付终身的私人仪式。他们用结婚这个词来描述他们之间的关系。他们还买了情侣戒指, 信誓旦旦在性关系上忠于对方, 感情方面互为支持, 而且表示在家庭财政等方面拥有*等的发言权。此外, 许许多多的男女同性恋者都有孩子。在许多情况下, 这些孩子是同性恋者在以前的异性恋婚姻中的结晶。后来, 这个同性恋者在公开场合里承认了他或她的同性恋倾向。一些孩子在同性恋家庭里得到抚养——— 家里或有两个男人, 或有两个女人, 抑或是其他某种家庭构成。举例来说, 南希是一名女同性恋者, 她与两个男同性恋者共同抚养了一个女儿, 这两个男同性恋中有一个人就是这个孩子的生父。

　　同性恋伴侣和异性恋伴侣一样要克服相同的困难。他们要面对家庭劳动分工、家庭权力、性关系和金钱等问题。另外, 像那些与不同种族的人结合的伴侣一样, 同性恋伴侣还要面对因社会对同性恋关系的歧视所引发的其他问题。曾有一次盖洛普民意测验, 调查美国公众对情投意合的成年人之间的同性恋关系是否合法的观点, 结果发现从20 世纪70 年代中期到90 年代末, 认为同性恋关系不合法的人数比例在不断攀升。因此, 同性恋家庭不仅要应付与其他家庭相同的问题, 而且还要面对一个充满敌意的社会环境, 并应付同性恋关系。

英语六级阅读理解的参考练习题2

　　10 Ways Obama Could Fight Climate Change

　　[A] One of the biggest surprises of President Barack Obama"s inaugural address,on Monday was how much he focused on fighting climate change, spending more time on that issue than any other. "We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations," Obama said. The President pointed out that recent severe weather supplied an urgent impetus for energy innovation and staked the nation"s economic future on responding to a changing climate. "We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries--we must claim its promise," Obama said. "" That"s how we will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure--our forests and waterways; our croplands and snowcapped (山顶积雪的) peaks. That is how we will preserve our planet, commanded to our care by God. " so what could the President reasonably do to deliver on that vow? Here are ten of their suggestions:

　　Sunset coal with new incentives and regulations.

　　[B] "Provide incentives to phase out the oldest, most polluting power plants," said Robert Jackson, a climate scientist at Duke University. It"s already happening, to some degree, as more of the nation transitions to natural gas. Earth scientist Bill Chameides, dean of Duke"s Nicholas School of the Environment and a former chief scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund, urges the administration to use its Clean, Air Act authority to promulgate (颁布 )carbon regulations for existing power plants like it has for new ones: "Doing that will force fuel switching from coal to natural gas. "Invest federal stimulus money in nuclear power.

　　[C] It"s hardly a perfect fuel, as accidents like Japan"s Fukushima fallout have shown, but with safety precautions new nuclear plants can meaningfully offset dirtier types of energy, supporters say."Nuclear is the only short-to medium-term way to really get away from fossil fuels," said Peter Raven. President emeritus of the Missouri Botanical Garden. He said the damage done by relentless global warming will far exceed the damage done by faults in the nuclear system.

　　Kill the Keystone pipeline.

　　[D] The controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline is up for review again by the White House this year. "The font thing he should do to set the tone to a lower carbon economy is to reject the Keystone pipeline, “said Raymond Pierrehum Bert, a geophysical scientist at the University of Chicago. The pipeline was never going to be a major driver of global emissions, but Pierre humbert and some other environmentalists say that by killing it the President would send a clear message about America"s intent to ramp down fossil fuels.

　　Protect the oceans by executive order.

　　[E] Land use is complicated, but large swaths of oceans can be protected by executive order. Just as President George W. Bush designated the world"s largest marine monument northwest of Hawaii in 2006. Obama could single-handedly protect other areas. National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence Sylvia Earle said the President should focus on parts of the Arctic that are under U. S. control, putting them off limits to energy production, commercial fishing, and mineral exploration. Marine sanctuaries (禁捕区) won"t stop climate change, but they can give marine species a better chance of adapting to it by reducing the other man-made threats the animals face.

　　Experiment with capturing carbon.

　　[F] Huge untapped reserves of natural gas and oil make it unlikely that the U. S. will transition away from fossil fuels in the immediate future. Instead, said Wallace Broecker, geology professor at Columbia University"s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, we should attack the atmosphere"s carbon surplus directly. "Obama could make available funds to build and test prototype air capture units" to capture and store CO2, said Broecker. Removing some carbon from the atmosphere could buy valuable time as policy makers and scientists explore more permanent solutions.

　　Grow government research for new energy sources.

　　[G] The Department of Energy has a nimble program that"s tasked with innovative energy research—the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. The ARPA-E funds research in biofuels, transmission,and battery storage, with an annual budget of $ 275 million. Last year, DOE officials requested at least $ 75 million more. Increasing funding for ARPA-E, said Rare Pomerance, former deputy assistant secretary of state for environment and development and currently an environmental consultant, "you get new technologies that undercut coal, oil, and gas. " Plus, he said, yon get a competitive advantage if American researchers uncover the next big idea in new energy.

　　Tax carbon.

　　[H] Congress would have to agree, but many climate experts say that the most meaningful way to tackle emissions is to set a price on carbon. "We should be asking people to pay the cost of putting carbon into the atmosphere as they buy the fuel," said Josh Willis, climate scientist and oceanographer at NASA"s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. To gain political support for the idea, Obama would probably have to show that the tax wonld help accelerate technology, grow new industries, and pay down the deficit.

　　Dial back the federal government"s energy use.

　　[I] With more than I. 8 million employees, $ 500 billion in annual purchasing power, and 500,000 buildings to operate, the federal government has been a leader in reducing energy use since Obama signed a 2009 executive order to cut waste. "I would urge him to keep using the power of government to promote energy conservation," said Syndonia Bret-Harte, an Arctic biologist who studies climate change at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.

　　Build a scientific clearinghouse for climate information.

　　[J] "I advocate for building a better information system on what is happening and why," said Kevin Tren berth, head of the Climate Analysis Section at the U. S. National Center for Atmospheric Research. That involves compiling observations related to climate change from around the world and using the data to refine climate modeling. Think of it as a one-stop, user-friendly website that clearly demonstrates how weather data from around the globe are influenced by broader shifts in the planet"s climate.

　　Keep talking. Despite a consensus among top scientists, the world still needs some convincing on climate change.

　　[K] A CNN poll last week found that just 49 percent of Americans agree that global warming is real and is due to human activities. "The most important thing the President can do is to build on his inaugural comments to heighten the sense of urgency about rapid climate destabilization and clarify its connection to virtually every other issue on the national agenda," said David Orr, environmental studies professor at Oberlin College. That means using the bully clergymen to show how a more volatile climate affects everything from agriculture to transportation to 21st-century warfare.